Mexico can indeed
be the land of opportunity for the '90s. In fact, Mexico reminds me of
the United States in 1947. The population is growing at over two percent
annually and about 50 percent of the population are under 20 years of age.
Economic and political improvements include: renewed capital inflow, anticipation
of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a free trade policy,
encouragement of foreign investment, improved Job opportunities, and relatively
cheap labor. Real estate shortages are now being addressed.
Many U.S. and Mexican interests have already decided that the opportunity
exists with or without NAFTA. Can one go wrong? Easily if one ignores
a prudent approach. My staff and I have been conducting market and feasibility
studies in Mexico for over 25 years for both Mexican and U.S. companies.
Cities studied include Mexico City and most of the other cities with over
100,000 people. Over this period, I have witnessed a significant increase
in mobility, the first modern shopping centers built, the oil boom, and
the debt expansion of the later '70s and early '80s. Moreover, I
watched in horror at the decline of the Mexican peso from eight pesos to
the dollar to over 3,000. In the mid '80s, the peso decline resulted
in the loss of over half of the country's wealth and the flight of most
of the country's capital.
Unfortunately, I
have seen interest rates at over 100 percent and inflation at over 150
percent in a single year. On the positive side, I have watched President
Salinas, tighten the economy, privatize industry and the banks, reduce
tariffs, eliminate trade barriers to foreign investment, encourage tourism
and industrial development, and promote NAFTA.
It is important to
recognize that many announced governmental changes are not changes in the
law, but rather changes in the current policy or interpretation of the
law. Thus, there is always the risk of a change in policy that could make
investing in Mexico even more uncertain. It seems very unlikely;
however when considering a long term commitment, the risk must be recognized.
U.S. realty firms,
real estate developers and investment banking houses, along with others
are rushing to make joint venture deals with Mexican firms to get an inside
track to the "Mexican gold rush." In my opinion, joint ventures are the
way to go in Mexico. One needs local understanding, of not only the markets,
but how to get things done. Rules may change, but old customs in Mexico
die hard.
Let's examine some
of the problems, opportunities and risks.
AVAILABLE DATA
Anyone who has attempted
to obtain reliable market data on Mexico knows that the process is very
discouraging. This goes for housing, office space, retail sales, and to
a lesser extent, industrial development. What we normally expect
in the U.S. and Canada, we can only dream of in Mexico. Moreover, most
of the data are of questionable accuracy. Over the years of revolution,
oppression and violent monetary fluctuation, the Mexican people have become
very leery of giving out information. Even the Census conducted by
the government is questionable. It is getting better, because of
companies like ours who are developing inventories and generating market
data, along with the demands being made by foreign investors for more accurate
information.
GROWTH IN MEXICO
Mexico is truly exploding.
The country is growing at over 2 percent annually and that is likely to
eventually rise. Thus, the country is adding over 1,700,000 persons annually.
In Mexico City, the population growth accounts for an additional 300,000
persons annually. At five persons per household, this represents a housing
need for 60,000 units. Unfortunately, poverty reduces the demand considerably.
Nevertheless, the demand would indicate a need for over 20,000 units annually.
Combined with the fact that over 50 percent of the population are under
20 years of age, the demand will continue to rise.
The average family
size is between 5 and 6 persons.
CITIES OF MEXICO
Approximately 18
percent of Mexico's population is concentrated in the Mexico City area
(known as the Federal District). The Mexico City Metropolitan Area
has over 15,000,000 persons (not the 22,000,000 persons that we so often
hear). Metropolitan Guadalajara and Monterrey currently have 3,244,000
and 2,640,000 persons, respectively. Puebla follows with approximately
1,500,000 persons, while Leon has 1,175,000 persons. The balance of the
cities have population below one million persons. Nevertheless, there are
over 20 cities with over 250,000 persons.
INCOME
Income data in Mexico
are very suspect. The census reports income by socio-economic level
(i.e., A,B,C,D,E, and so on, A being the highest income, while E low income).
The determination is not made directly from census data. The process involves
observation and evaluation of housing size, security guards, housing value,
number of automobiles, running water, sanitary facilities, general locale
and other wealth indicators.
From a developer's
prospective, the total population of each city is not really important.
Rather, the number of people who have A, B or C income levels is generally
the issue. The three levels generally have sufficient discretionary buying
power for housing, automobiles, restaurants, shopping centers, discounters,
office space, entertainment, banking, travel, and other demands.
CAPITAL AND
INTEREST RATES
Today, many real
estate development opportunities in Mexico are the result of recent capital
starvation. If the Mexicans had access to capital in the later '80s,
many of the underbuilt markets would be fully developed. Because of the
many crises, there has been little long-term capital. Thus, developments
have been financed with short-term capital expecting a high return.
Most developments have been condominiums, where one can recover one's capital
relatively soon. Only recently, with the return of American and foreign
investors, have we seen longer term financing and developments oriented
toward leasing.
Interest rates for
short-term capital are currently about 28 percent. In 1990, interest
rates were between 36 and 37 percent, if anyone would loan the money. In
1987, interest rates were over 100 percent for very short-term loans.
KEY MONEY
In Mexico, "key money"
is paid for the privilege of purchasing or occupying a space, in addition
to the purchase price. U.S. developers and investors are enamored by the
large amounts of key money paid for retail and office space. They often
believe that the money signifies the strength of market demand and, to
some extent, it does. However, in reality, key money is a reflection of
risk/return. Along with advance rent, it has been a way for developers
to finance developments. Historically, the developer, his family and friends,
along with advanced rent, provided the capital to complete a project. Key
money and the sale of the condominium units represented recovery of short-term
capital. Naturally, this would not be the case in an overbuilt market.
Also, long-term financing and a number of new developments will reduce
and perhaps eliminate key money.
THE OFFICE
MARKET
According to our
studies, there is a significant shortage of office space, especially in
Mexico City. Most buildings are condominiums. Vacancy is the result
of an office condo on the market for sale. Rental units are leased almost
immediately.
The lack of capital
and long-term financing has limited the number and size of office buildings
constructed. Presently, there is an estimated 68 to 70 million square
feet of office space in Mexico City. First class space accounts for about
10,000,000 square
feet, by our standards. Another 9 to 10 million is classified as first
class by Mexican standards. First class office space would rent for between
$50 and $60 per square foot, with no tenant improvements or services. Land
costs in Mexico are much higher than New York. Generally, land costs anywhere
from two to ten times the cost of land in New York City. However,
no matter how you approach it, there is a major market for the development
of first class office space.
The same is true
in Guadalajara and Monterrey, but obviously to a much lesser extent.
RETAIL TRENDS
In an article published
in The News of Mexico City, Sr. Fernando Rius Abud, the head of
the National Chamber of Commerce (Canaco) in Mexico, stated that "retail
sales for small shoppers goods stores dropped 17 percent last year (1992)
and are still declining. Demand can't survive an 11 percent inflation
rate. Basic products are the only goods that have shown some growth, while
the rest of the market has softened dramatically." Sales of basic goods,
according to Canaco, increased 26 percent in 1992. Basic goods include
food, drugs, liquor and eating and drinking. One of the best kept
secrets in Mexico is the impact that trade liberalization is having upon
small retailers.
Overall, Mexico's
retail sales grew from an estimated $66 billion in 1990 to $83 billion
in 1991, an increase of 25.7 percent. This is in contrast to the
U.S. where retail sales were $1,807 billion in 1990, rising to $1,820 billion
in 1991. An increase of less than one percent. However, Mexico's
retail sales grew by $17 billion, while the U.S. grew by $13 billion.
Even given a 12 percent Mexican inflation rate for the period against about
3 percent for the U.S., it's mighty impressive when one considers the countries'
differences.
In Mexico, the largest
number of people have the least to spend. In fact, while the middle
class in growing and income is rising, the greatest income increases are
occurring in the high income families extending down to the upper middle
income households. Thus, upscale demand is increasing more rapidly than
mass-goods demand. Nevertheless, there are far more people in the middle
to poor categories.
U.S. retailers are
rushing to enter the Mexican market. Wal- Mart has a joint venture
with Cifra, S.A. (Mexico's largest retailer) to open Sam's Warehouses (Club
Aurrera); Price Club has joint venture with Comercial Mexicana; K-Mart
with El Puerto de Liverpool to develop Super-K's, while J.C. Penney and
Dillard's department stores are apparently going into Mexico alone.
Interestingly, there is significant retail competition in Mexico.
However, U.S. retailers have more efficient buying and distribution
systems which can result in lower prices. The first Price Club opening
in Mexico City set records for the first months sales for both the chain
and for the Mexican market.
Shopping centers
in Mexico have hundreds of small stores. A typical shopping center
of 300,000 square feet usually will have between 200 and 300 small stores.
With the development of larger, more modern (air conditioned) competitive
retail space, Mexico will begin to experience the demise of the small businessman.
Gross margins in Mexico have been much higher than in the United States,
because of limited imports, close control of Mexican manufactured goods
and the control of distribution.
Melvin Simon and
Associates and the Sid Uberman Company have entered into a joint venture
agreement with FRISA, S.A. of Mexico to develop three major malls in Mexico
City. In Guadalajara and Monterrey, Simon and Uberman have joined
Fondo Opcion and Grupo ICA (Mexico's largest construction company) to develop
a major mall in each city. The objective is to mix both Mexican and U.S.
retailers in the malls. Dillard's and Penney's are expected to be occupants
in many of the malls. However, the most significant difference will
be that the malls will be leased, rather than the typical condominium arrangements.
Mexican retailers are not accustomed to renting, and they certainly do
not divulge their sales. Rents and percentage retails, in my opinion,
will be a tough sell. Financing will also be provided by U.S. or
foreign sources.
The Hahn Company
has a joint venture with Grupo Gutas S.A. to develop the 750,000 square
foot part of the World Trade Center in Mexico City. Saks Fifth Avenue is
reportedly serious about locating a major store there.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Mexico's road structure
is poor, especially outside of Mexico City, Guadalajara and Monterrey and
in the poor neighborhoods of cities. Most highways are two lane in
varying conditions. Mexico does not have an interstate highway system like
the United States. There is no gasoline tax in Mexico to finance an interstate
system. Instead the Mexican government has entered into an agreement with
a consortium of firms to construct toll roads both around major cities
and to connect market areas. The program has been a disaster. Tolls
for the outer expressway (Periférico) are over $15 U.S. (N$45 pesos).
A total of about 1,300 miles have been built, leaving 2,700 more miles
to go. Chicago probably has as many, if not more, tollroads than any other
U.S. city. One can travel the entire tollroad system around Chicago for
under $2.40 (N$7.20 pesos). I am told that one can also drive the entire
New Jersey Turnpike for $4.60. Thus, a significant change in the funding
of the highway debt must be accomplished before the tolls are lowered or
more toll roads are constructed. Needless to say, if one has the money,
traveling around Mexico City is much faster on the Tollroad. Recently,
while driving around Mexico City on the tollroad, I encountered only five
other vehicles. This is incredible given the traffic congestion throughout
Mexico City.
TRAFFIC
The average resident
of New York would find Mexico City traffic abominable. In fact, Mexican
visitors to New York consider it a drive in the country. Mexico City and
Rome residents know the true meaning of traffic congestion. Combined with
the worst air quality of any major city in the world, Mexico City, at an
altitude of over 7,000 feet, is a challenge for only the hearty. One can
rarely go from one location to another by automobile without a substantial
delay. In Mexico, traffic congestion is a way of life.
LABOR COSTS
Businessmen in the
U.S. and Canada consider the low wages in Mexico a bargain. However,
if you think that fringe benefits have gotten out of hand in the U.S.,
then try Mexico. In Mexico, there are a number of hidden fringe benefits,
such as one month vacations, large severance payments (about one year),
medical costs, bonuses and others. Thus, often the fringe benefits are
equal to or even, in some cases, larger than the hourly wage. Even
so, labor costs are less than the U.S. productivity, though it varies depending
upon the industry, the job and the city.
SUMMARY
Mexico offers many
opportunities to U.S. developers. However, the opportunity must be approached
carefully. Mexican partners are, in my opinion, a must. Partner
selection is even more critical than normal. Partnerships opportunities
are usually handled through Mexican lawyers. Integrity, position and business
practices are more important than making a deal with an industry leader.
Many U.S. firms will become very disheartened over the next five years
as partnerships do not live up to their expectations. The Mexican governmental
process is slow to move, and is heavily influenced by relationships.
Therefore, having the best site, an exciting project, 100 percent pre-leased,
financing in place, and general governmental approval, does not ensure
a permit to construct. It can be very frustrating. Finally, the opportunity
has to be equated to the risk. At the moment, many opportunities
exist with less risk than normal. However, the rush to develop in Mexico
will, as it did in the U.S. and Canada, overbuild the market, unless some
form of constraint is instituted. If you are inclined, select the
opportunity carefully, pick the right partners, research the market, target
the occupants carefully, watch the currency, and develop the property. |